By What Smithii's Pump.fun Bundler does
Smithii's Pump.fun Bundler creates a token and buys it in the same transaction, distributing the initial buy across multiple wallets so the launch looks organic and no outside sniper can front-run it. It's non-custodial - wallet generation happens in the browser - and charges a flat SOL fee per use rather than a percentage of volume.
Smithii itself is a broader suite: alongside the bundler, it offers a separate Bundle Sell tool, a volume bot, a comment bot, a stand-alone token creator, vesting and staking tools, and a Creator Fees claimer that aggregates pending rewards across multiple launchpads - each as its own dedicated tool page rather than one shared workflow.
What TokenBundle does differently
TokenBundle isn't limited to pump.fun or Solana - the same account coordinates launches on Robinhood Chain and Ethereum too. On Robinhood Chain specifically, deploying a token contract, managing its launch, and bundling a multi-wallet buy are steps in one connected workflow rather than separate tools with separate fees.
Feature comparison
| TokenBundle | Smithii | |
|---|---|---|
| Chains supported | Robinhood Chain, Solana, Ethereum, BNB Chain | Solana only |
| Interface | One unified workspace | Suite of separate tool pages (bundler, bundle sell, volume bot, token creator, and more) |
| Deploy and bundle in one flow | Yes - deploy, manage and bundle share one workflow | No - token creation and bundling are separate tools with separate fees |
| Fee model | Execution fee per transaction | Flat SOL fee per tool per use, plus a separate service fee on some tools |
| Custody model | Non-custodial | Non-custodial (as stated for its Bundler tool) |
| Claim creator fees across multiple launchpads | Not currently offered | Yes - a dedicated tool aggregates pending creator rewards across platforms |
Where Smithii's broader toolkit is genuinely useful
Smithii's suite goes beyond launch execution into things TokenBundle doesn't currently do - notably the cross-platform creator fee claimer, which pulls pending rewards from multiple launchpads into one place instead of checking each one separately. For a creator running tokens across several pump.fun-style platforms, that alone can be worth the separate tool.
Where the separate-tools approach adds friction
The tradeoff for that breadth is that each Smithii tool is its own page with its own fee: creating a token, bundling the launch, and later selling or boosting it are distinct actions you set up separately rather than one continuous plan you review once. For a straightforward deploy-then-bundle launch, that means more separate steps and more separate charges than a workflow built to keep them together from the start.
Where TokenBundle fits better
If you launch on more than one chain, or want deploying and bundling to be one reviewable plan instead of two separate tools, TokenBundle covers that ground. If cross-platform creator fee claiming on Solana specifically is what you need most, Smithii's toolkit already covers it.
FAQ
- Is Smithii's bundler custodial or non-custodial? Non-custodial, based on its own description - wallet generation happens in the browser.
- Can Smithii's bundler launch on chains other than Solana? No - it's built specifically for Solana and pump.fun.
- Does TokenBundle aggregate creator fees across multiple launchpads? Not currently - this is an area where Smithii's toolkit currently goes further.
- Does TokenBundle charge separate fees for deploying versus bundling? No - on Robinhood Chain, deploying, managing and bundling a launch are part of one workflow rather than separately priced tools.
Coordinate your launch with TokenBundle.
Prepare wallets, review allocations and manage network-specific launch execution from one workspace.
Open Solana workspace